refraction - PMC

Result Filters

You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 47962

<< First< Prev

Page of 2399

Next >Last >>

Select item 110209901.

Evaluation of objective and subjective binocular ocular refraction with looking in type

Megumi Fukushima, Masakazu Hirota, Takafumi Yukimori, Akio Hayashi, Yoko Hirohara, Makoto Saika, Kumiko Matsuoka

BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24: 170. Published online 2024 Apr 16. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03449-y

PMCID:: PMC11020990

Article PDF–3.7M

Select item 79593912.

Prediction of cycloplegic refraction for noninvasive screening of children for refractive error

Kazuyoshi Magome, Naoyuki Morishige, Akifumi Ueno, Taka-Aki Matsui, Eiichi Uchio

PLoS One. 2021; 16(3): e0248494. Published online 2021 Mar 15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248494

PMCID:: PMC7959391

Article PDF–1.8M

Select item 93329613.

The Pentacam® AXL Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study

Kepa Balparda, Andrea Acevedo-Urrego, Laura Andrea Silva-Quintero, Tatiana Herrera-Chalarca

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 May; 70(5): 1533–1537. Published online 2022 Apr 28. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3006_21

PMCID:: PMC9332961

Article PDF–859K

Select item 69018874.

Dynamic profile of ocular refraction in pediatric cataract patients after lens surgeries

Zhen-Zhen Liu, Er-Ping Long, Duo-Ru Lin, Lei Ye, Yi-Fan Xiang, Wang-Ting Li, Xiao-Hang Wu, Xu-Tu Zhao, Xiao-Ping Liu, Lan-Qin Zhao, Xiu-Cheng Huang, Tong-Yong Yu, Hui Chen, Jing-Jing Chen, Ming-Xing Wu, Hao-Tian Lin, Wei-Rong Chen, Yi-Zhi Liu

Int J Ophthalmol. 2019; 12(12): 1839–1847. Published online 2019 Dec 18. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.12.04

PMCID:: PMC6901887

Article PDF–2.2M

Select item 97588405.

Identification of ocular refraction based on deep learning algorithm as a novel retinoscopy method

Haohan Zou, Shenda Shi, Xiaoyan Yang, Jiaonan Ma, Qian Fan, Xuan Chen, Yibing Wang, Mingdong Zhang, Jiaxin Song, Yanglin Jiang, Lihua Li, Xin He, Vishal Jhanji, Shengjin Wang, Meina Song, Yan Wang

Biomed Eng Online. 2022; 21: 87. Published online 2022 Dec 17. doi: 10.1186/s12938-022-01057-9

PMCID:: PMC9758840

Article PDF–1.5M

Select item 96846196.

The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction

Jie Huang, Xiaoning Li, Tao Yan, Longbo Wen, Lun Pan, Zhikuan Yang

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Nov; 11(11): 16. Published online 2022 Nov 17. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.11.16

PMCID:: PMC9684619

Article PDF–1.0M

Select item 28859737.

Genomewide Linkage Scans for Ocular Refraction and Meta-analysis of Four Populations in the Myopia Family Study

Robert Wojciechowski, Dwight Stambolian, Elise Ciner, Grace Ibay, Taura N. Holmes, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 Jun 15.

Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 May; 50(5): 2024–2032. Published online 2009 Jan 17. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2848

PMCID:: PMC2885973

Article PDF–810K

Select item 100875468.

Peripheral refraction, relative peripheral refraction, and axial growth: 18‐month data from the randomised study—Clinical study Of Near‐sightedness; TReatment with Orthokeratology Lenses (CONTROL study)

Trine M. Jakobsen, Anders P. Søndergaard, Flemming Møller

Acta Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb; 101(1): e69–e80. Published online 2022 Aug 8. doi: 10.1111/aos.15217

PMCID:: PMC10087546

Article PDF–2.0M

Select item 93180929.

Relative peripheral refraction and its role in myopia onset in teenage students

Lin-Song Qi, Lu Yao, Xue-Feng Wang, Jin Zhao, Yong Liu, Teng-Yun Wu, Qing-Hong Yang, Chen Zhao, Zhi-Kang Zou

Int J Ophthalmol. 2022; 15(7): 1108–1115. Published online 2022 Jul 18. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.07.10

PMCID:: PMC9318092

Article PDF–1.0M

Select item 607579110.

Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction

Gonzalo Carracedo, Carlos Carpena-Torres, Maria Serramito, Laura Batres-Valderas, Anahi Gonzalez-Bergaz

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Jul; 7(4): 11. Published online 2018 Aug 3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.4.11

PMCID:: PMC6075791

Article PDF–632K

Select item 309703111.

Genomewide Scan of Ocular Refraction in African-American Families Shows Significant Linkage to Chromosome 7p15

Elise Ciner, Robert Wojciechowski, Grace Ibay, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Dwight Stambolian

Genet Epidemiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 May 18.

Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Jul; 32(5): 454–463. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20318

PMCID:: PMC3097031

Article PDF–357K

Select item 644987212.

Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter

Carles Otero, Mikel Aldaba, Jaume Pujol

J Optom. 2019 Apr-Jun; 12(2): 74–83. Published online 2018 Oct 30. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2018.09.001

PMCID:: PMC6449872

Article PDF–1.9M

Select item 925395913.

Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study

Rui Guo, Li Shi, Ke Xu, Dejian Hong

Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun; 11(6): 933–946. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-226

PMCID:: PMC9253959

Article PDF–2.2M

Select item 741461914.

A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions

Juan Tabernero, Carles Otero, Shahina Pardhan

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jun; 9(7): 23. Published online 2020 Jun 22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.23

PMCID:: PMC7414619

Article PDF–1.6M

Select item 930696215.

Investigating target refraction advice provided to cataract surgery patients by UK optometrists and ophthalmologists

Emily Charlesworth, Alison J Alderson, Fiona Fylan, Richard A Armstrong, Aman Chandra, David B Elliott

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May; 42(3): 440–453. Published online 2022 Feb 18. doi: 10.1111/opo.12957

PMCID:: PMC9306962

Article PDF–1.9M

Select item 1032318916.

Refraction and defocus curves in eyes with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses

Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo, Noemí Burguera, Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada, Jaime Aramberri, Joaquín Fernández

J Optom. 2023 Jul-Sep; 16(3): 236–243. Published online 2023 Mar 23. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.01.005

PMCID:: PMC10323189

Article PDF–1.0M

Select item 1054278017.

A focusing method on refraction topography measurement

Huang Yequan, Guo Jingyun, Guo Yu, Cui Yan, Li Zhechuang, Dong Xuechuan, Ning Xiaolin

Sci Rep. 2023; 13: 16440. Published online 2023 Sep 30. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42950-0

PMCID:: PMC10542780

Article PDF–2.8M

Select item 871257918.

Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction

Shahram Bamdad, Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam, Milad Abdolahian, David P. Piñero

J Optom. 2022 Jan-Mar; 15(1): 100–106. Published online 2020 Sep 28. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008

PMCID:: PMC8712579

Article PDF–508K

Select item 312399819.

Genomewide scan in Ashkenazi Jewish families demonstrates evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to a QTL on chromosome 1p36

Robert Wojciechowski, Chris Moy, Elise Ciner, Grace Ibay, Lauren Reider, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Dwight Stambolian

Hum Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 Jun 27.

Published in final edited form as: Hum Genet. 2006 May; 119(4): 389–399. Published online 2006 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0153-x

PMCID:: PMC3123998

Article PDF–348K

Select item 545960320.

Association of Body Length with Ocular Parameters in Mice

Ranjay Chakraborty, Han na Park, Christopher C. Tan, Paul Weiss, Megan C. Prunt, Machelle T. Pardue

Optom Vis Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Mar; 94(3): 387–394. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001036

PMCID:: PMC5459603

Article PDF–293K

<< First< Prev

Page of 2399

Next >Last >>

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Manage Filters

PMC Images search for refraction

Fig 3Distribution of cycloplegic cylinder refraction and predicted cylinder refraction in the validation group.

Cylinder refraction estimated by the prediction formula was correlated with cycloplegic cylinder refraction (R² = 0.799).

Prediction of cycloplegic refraction for noninvasive screening of children for refractive error

PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248494.
Fig 2Distribution of cycloplegic spherical refraction and predicted spherical refraction in the validation group.

Spherical refraction estimated by the prediction formula was highly correlated with cycloplegic spherical refraction (R² = 0.924).

Prediction of cycloplegic refraction for noninvasive screening of children for refractive error

PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248494.
Figure 5

Scatter plots showing the relationship between the refractive errors measured by two autorefractors and those measured by subjective refraction after cycloplegia. (A) SD of WAM vs. subjective refraction; (B) SD of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction; (C) SE of WAM vs. subjective refraction; (D) SE of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction; (E) J0 of WAM vs. subjective refraction; (F) J0 of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction; (G) J45 of WAM vs. subjective refraction; and (H) J45 of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction. SD, spherical diopter; SE, spherical equivalence; J0, the axial 0°/180° representing with/against the rule of astigmatism; J45, the axial 45°/135° representing the oblique axis of astigmatism; D, diopter.

Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study

Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun;11(6):933-946.
Figure 3

Scatter plots showing the relationship between the results of the two autorefractors before cycloplegia and those measured by subjective refraction after cycloplegia. (A) SD of WAM vs. subjective refraction; (B) SD of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction; (C) SE of WAM vs. subjective refraction; (D) SE of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction; (E) J0 of WAM vs. subjective refraction; (F) J0 of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction; (G) J45 of WAM vs. subjective refraction; and (H) J45 of TOPCON vs. subjective refraction. SD, spherical diopter; SE, spherical equivalence; J0, the axial 0°/180° representing with/against the rule of astigmatism; J45, the axial 45°/135° representing the oblique axis of astigmatism; D, diopter.

Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study

Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun;11(6):933-946.